Add an executor benchmark that keeps its results
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
Choosing a local executor model, and tuning its knobs, needs measured success rates across repeated runs, comparable with every model measured before. - Four canned milestones under nisse_dev/bench/tasks: write a function, fix a bug a failing test exposes, thread an option through several files, and find one failure in output far past max_output_chars. Each is an approved plan over a seed project, judged by a hidden check the model never sees; a reference solution proves each is solvable and that its check tells the difference - Runs use the agent's own client wiring, now shared as make_llm_clients, with delegation and ask_expert off: an escalation is a failure of the model under test - Each run is stored as one JSON line in bench/results/, committed, with the model's backing name and declared facts, a note on how it was served, the task's content hash, the agent's commit and tuning, the outcome, turns, misbehaviour counts, context trims, tokens, time and LiteLLM's cost; a fallback answer can never count as a success - The report rebuilds the comparison from every stored run, with Wilson 95% intervals, marking runs against older task versions - scripts/benchmark.py runs and reports; scripts/evaluate_model.sh takes a new model through the context probe, the capability matrix and the benchmark in one command - Clients keep LiteLLM's per-call cost, and BudgetedClient counts the requests it had to trim - The tuning guide gains "Benchmarking models" Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
b2bbf70b7b
commit
50b46821d7
37 files changed
+1912
-37
No files matched your search
Whitespace-only changes.
Reference in new issue
Block a user