Development Plan M1.1, as discussed.
- Schema v4: a work_items table (id, scope, title, status, outcome,
position, data) and an agent row whose active_item points at one
(NULL: idle). Canonical events and intents carry their work item, and
events their actor. Older stores are refused with a clear message:
there was no production data, so no migration (the mechanism stays).
- The log is reached through a Transcript bound to one work item and
one actor: store.transcript(item, actor) reads only that item and
writes with both. The planner, executor, delegation and expert desk
get one per call from the orchestrator instead of holding the store,
so a component can neither read another task's events (the planner
read every earlier task's, #78) nor write without attribution.
store.all_events() is kept for readers that span items (evaluation
capture, dumps). Intents are begun through the transcript or with
work_item=, so each belongs to its item.
- The orchestrator opens a work item on 'use', closes it with its
outcome (completed or abandoned), and carries what the operator said
while idle into the new item as copies with their origin, so a task
sent before 'use' is still planned from (D1). control.py keeps its
state machine through get_state()/transition(), now over the active
work item, until M2.6 retires it.
- nisse_dev.dump shows work items and each event's item and actor.
Tests: test_work_items.py (scoping, attribution, intent ownership,
restart, outcomes, carried messages, a second task never seeing the
first); the suites updated for the per-call transcript.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
Architecture L9's role names, for the two roles with a direct
counterpart: the delegation role is now 'helper' and the ask_expert role
'expert', in RoleMap, configuration (roles.helper, roles.expert),
recorded events and tests. 'planner' and 'executor' stay distinct for
now; they become 'driver' when the new loop merges them (Development
Plan M2.3).
Configurations must rename their keys: nisse-dev.example.yaml and
tests/integration/nisse-test.yaml are updated here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
Development Plan M0.1. Every section reference in code, tests, specs/,
the example config, the tuning guide, and the CLAUDE.md and README files
now cites docs/Architecture.md (P, L, D, O, X, Q) instead of the old
spec's A-H, and docs/Architecture-Build-Spec.md is deleted (git keeps
it). The plan's old-to-new table goes with it.
Mostly mechanical, with a per-site choice where one old section split:
A4 became L2 where it meant stop/abandon/the loop and L3 where it meant
approvals; A10 became L6 in the context-budget code and L7 elsewhere; B2
became D4 for outbound Gitea and publishing and D5 for review intake;
'A3 step N' became the matching step of L8's boot sequence. Comments
describing behaviour the architecture drops (planning always escalating,
thresholds tuned at an old build step) now describe the current code and
point at the Development Plan.
docs/Architecture.md gains one line the rewrite missed: intake outages
delay but never fail work (old B2), now in L5, where the poller and
Matrix code cite it.
Comments and docs only; no behaviour change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
On the first live run the executor committed its milestone itself, as
its plan asked. The publisher only published a commit it made, found a
clean tree, reported "no changes to publish", and left the agent in
EXECUTING, where every message is answered "busy".
- publish(): with nothing left to commit, publish anyway when the branch
has commits origin/<base> lacks; report no changes only when it has
none.
- push_followup(): same for review fixes, comparing HEAD with what the
remote branch holds (ls-remote; pushes go by URL, so there is no
tracking ref).
- Nothing to publish now gates to AWAIT_INPUT, and the reply returns to
the still-approved milestone plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
Completes the B1 loop past EXECUTING, and answers the question raised
reviewing #6: PR acceptance is a milestone's final gate, so there is
no separate FINISHED state — completion returns to milestone planning
or to IDLE.
- publish.py: MilestonePublisher commits the work on a task-namespaced
branch, pushes, and opens a PR carrying the approved plan. Intent is
recorded before the first externally visible act, so a crash
anywhere in the sequence leaves a durable record and boot
reconciliation asks Gitea whether the PR exists rather than opening
a second one
- Nothing to commit is reported, not raised: the executor may
legitimately conclude there was nothing to change
- control.py: PR_OPEN state with EXECUTING -> PR_OPEN and
PR_OPEN -> {MILESTONE_PLANNING, IDLE}; operator commands
'next milestone' and 'project complete'
- A configured publisher always contributes its own reconciler at
boot, so an interrupted publish is settled against external truth
without the caller having to remember to register it
- A publish failure gates to the operator rather than retrying into a
possible duplicate
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5