Back on a PR it reviewed: a new head gets a later review of the commits
since (each one's diff, through the API) and of its earlier points; what
was said since gets replies, answered where it was said or skipped with a
reason. It signs off once and stays quiet while still happy. Past
tuning.review.max_rounds it sums up for the operator and goes quiet,
until a push or someone other than the PR's author joins in. An
operator's `stop` quiets it; `review` asks for a fresh review.
Reviews carry numbered markers and replies their point's key, so
recovery posts nothing twice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
A review judges the CI result (R1), so a new head's review now waits while
its checks are pending, and starts once they finish, passed or failed. It
also keeps reviews off a GPU that CI is using: #154's first review ran
beside CI's end-to-end job and took about 30 minutes.
- Pending: waits up to tuning.review.ci_wait_s (1 h), then reviews anyway.
- No checks: waits tuning.review.ci_grace_s (2 min) for them to appear,
then reviews.
- A PR waiting on CI holds up no other: the oldest settled one goes first.
- The head's first sighting is kept on the item (seen_at).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
Found at bring-up: an empty private repository's /pulls answered 404, and
intake stopped there, so the whole round failed and nothing was reviewed.
A repository whose PRs can't be listed is now logged (intake.repo_failed)
and skipped for the round; its items stay as they are.
Also, from nisse-review's review of this PR: a two-page test pins the
search listing the patterns rest on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
At bring-up, `dev/*` failed: listing an organization's repositories
(/orgs/dev/repos) needs the read:organization token scope, which the
reviewer's token doesn't have and shouldn't need. Patterns are now matched
against /repos/search, which needs only the repository scope and already
lists every repository the account can read. A pattern that matches
nothing is logged (access.no_match). owner_repositories goes.
A Gitea error at startup is now reported like a config error, not a
traceback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
At bring-up, nisse-review read no repositories: Gitea's /user/repos leaves
out a public repository's Read collaborators, so dev/nisse never showed up.
`repositories` now holds patterns (dev/nisse, dev/*, */*) matched against
every repository the account can read, public ones included (an
organization's or user's list, or the instance's search); unset, it is
/user/repos as before. A configured repository it can't read is left out
with an oplog line.
The read-only wall (R3) is checked every round, not only at startup: an
account granted push or admin while running stops (exit 3) rather than
review on.
nisse-core's Gitea client gains GiteaNotFound for 404s, owner_repositories
and visible_repositories.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
A new package over nisse-core: it reviews every ready PR in the
repositories its account can read, and posts one COMMENT review.
- scheduler: each round, open PRs per readable repository (or the
configured repositories); an item per PR, ready unless draft or WIP;
closed with the PR. One review at a time, oldest first.
- reader: the repository at head and base from Gitea archives, unpacked
and read in Python (read_file, list_files, search_code), and its issues;
bound to the item's repository; no git, no shell.
- review: starts from the PR, commits, diff, comments, closed issues, CI;
comment drafts a point on any existing line; post_review posts one
COMMENT review at the head, inline where Gitea takes it, else as links in
the summary. ask_expert; vault and memory (memory/nisse-review).
- L8: posting is an intent; recovery asks Gitea for the marked review and
never posts twice; with Gitea down, the item waits.
- Failures retried, then said on the PR until the next push.
- Startup refuses an account that can push to or administer any repo.
- nisse-core gitea: readable_repositories, open_pull_requests, diff,
commits, archive, issue, search_issues, reviews, post_review; PR fields.
- Bring-up: scripts/review-bringup.sh; nisse-review.example.yaml.
- Tests: unit over a fake Gitea and scripted model; a live test
(NISSE_REVIEW_GITEA_TOKEN) reviews a PR in a fresh test repository.
- Docs: Development Plan M7.3, Tuning Guide (tuning.review.*).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5