From nisse-review's review of #156: only a failed listing fell back to
the PR's whole diff; one commit's diff failing (a force-push dropped it)
failed the run. Tests also pin down its other three points, which the
code already handled: a command is taken in once, a second review at the
same head has its own marker, and `review` beside a comment is one fresh
review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
Back on a PR it reviewed: a new head gets a later review of the commits
since (each one's diff, through the API) and of its earlier points; what
was said since gets replies, answered where it was said or skipped with a
reason. It signs off once and stays quiet while still happy. Past
tuning.review.max_rounds it sums up for the operator and goes quiet,
until a push or someone other than the PR's author joins in. An
operator's `stop` quiets it; `review` asks for a fresh review.
Reviews carry numbered markers and replies their point's key, so
recovery posts nothing twice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
From its failed review of #156: read_file stopped at 20,000 characters
with no way on, so the reviewer hunted each file's end a definition at a
time and ran out of turns; its retry carried every read before it, and a
model call timed out. Both drafts were lost.
- read_file takes a start line and says where the next part starts.
- Each run's view starts at its brief (Transcript.since); the log keeps
the rest.
- A run out of turns with points drafted posts them as a partial review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
A new package over nisse-core: it reviews every ready PR in the
repositories its account can read, and posts one COMMENT review.
- scheduler: each round, open PRs per readable repository (or the
configured repositories); an item per PR, ready unless draft or WIP;
closed with the PR. One review at a time, oldest first.
- reader: the repository at head and base from Gitea archives, unpacked
and read in Python (read_file, list_files, search_code), and its issues;
bound to the item's repository; no git, no shell.
- review: starts from the PR, commits, diff, comments, closed issues, CI;
comment drafts a point on any existing line; post_review posts one
COMMENT review at the head, inline where Gitea takes it, else as links in
the summary. ask_expert; vault and memory (memory/nisse-review).
- L8: posting is an intent; recovery asks Gitea for the marked review and
never posts twice; with Gitea down, the item waits.
- Failures retried, then said on the PR until the next push.
- Startup refuses an account that can push to or administer any repo.
- nisse-core gitea: readable_repositories, open_pull_requests, diff,
commits, archive, issue, search_issues, reviews, post_review; PR fields.
- Bring-up: scripts/review-bringup.sh; nisse-review.example.yaml.
- Tests: unit over a fake Gitea and scripted model; a live test
(NISSE_REVIEW_GITEA_TOKEN) reviews a PR in a fresh test repository.
- Docs: Development Plan M7.3, Tuning Guide (tuning.review.*).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5Utyfzw7gF7UhjRDEtjTk
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5