3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5	1ad0b2147d	Retire the old build spec, and point every reference at the architecture (M0.1) ... Development Plan M0.1. Every section reference in code, tests, specs/, the example config, the tuning guide, and the CLAUDE.md and README files now cites docs/Architecture.md (P, L, D, O, X, Q) instead of the old spec's A-H, and docs/Architecture-Build-Spec.md is deleted (git keeps it). The plan's old-to-new table goes with it. Mostly mechanical, with a per-site choice where one old section split: A4 became L2 where it meant stop/abandon/the loop and L3 where it meant approvals; A10 became L6 in the context-budget code and L7 elsewhere; B2 became D4 for outbound Gitea and publishing and D5 for review intake; 'A3 step N' became the matching step of L8's boot sequence. Comments describing behaviour the architecture drops (planning always escalating, thresholds tuned at an old build step) now describe the current code and point at the Development Plan. docs/Architecture.md gains one line the rewrite missed: intake outages delay but never fail work (old B2), now in L5, where the poller and Matrix code cite it. Comments and docs only; no behaviour change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE	2026-10-01 00:17:48 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5	d68e3b3a83	Add the abandon command ... A4 already names abandon as one of the ways out of a halt (continue, re-plan, or abandon) and 0.2 closes a work item as completed or abandoned, but no command did it: from a gate or a question the only way to drop a task was to edit the state database. - 'abandon' ends the task from any waiting state and returns to IDLE. The move is made durable first; then the plan issue and any open milestone PR are closed with a note (branches kept), and any unresolved intent is aborted so boot reconciliation does not gate on work dropped on purpose. A Gitea failure is reported, not fatal. - Like 'status' it is a command in every state, never read as an answer or feedback. While work runs, 'stop' comes first, as before. - The restart / stranded question and the PR_OPEN hints mention it. - Spec: B1 gains the abandon edge and B2 the command. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE	2026-09-29 17:43:43 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5	d508e9a9b7	Externalise plans to Gitea and accept approvals there (A4, Part H) ... - approvals.py: PlanBoard opens one issue per project and posts each plan revision as a comment carrying its rev tag. The state store keeps only a pointer, so gate state can be re-derived from Gitea after a state-volume loss — external truth wins - Gitea comments are a second approval source: revision binding, the typed word approve, and first-approval-wins work exactly as over transport, with a per-channel allowlist because a Gitea login is not a Matrix MXID - Outcomes are echoed to the other channel, so the two records cannot silently disagree about what was approved - A Gitea outage degrades durability of the record, not the ability to approve: planning proceeds and Matrix remains a complete channel - Live test now asserts the server refuses the agent's own merge and its push to the protected branch. That property was previously true only because our code did not attempt it; branch protection makes it structural, and this test fails if the protection is ever relaxed - Fixed a race in the process-group test: killing a group is asynchronous and the grandchild is an orphan, so its exit is not synchronised with our return; the test now waits for death Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-07 22:15:08 +00:00