Calibration showed Haiku fixing the right constant but keeping only four
decimal places, which passes the visible test and still loses the JPY
rate's precision. An explicit plan should say so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
All seven newer local models passed the original four tasks 20 of 20,
so the benchmark no longer told them apart. The new tasks keep plans
explicit, as the planner is told to write them, and make the work
itself harder:
- trace-bug: a wrong multi-currency total whose cause is a shared
rate helper; discounts and tax go through it too, so a fix at the
call site fails the check.
- refactor-rename: rename load_config across a ten-module package,
leaving load_config_defaults and reload_config alone.
- spec-parser: implement parse_duration from an eight-rule SPEC.md
given three examples, and write tests for every rule.
- long-milestone: eight dependent steps adding due dates to a task
tracker, from the model through storage versions to the CLI.
Self-tests prove that a call-site fix, a blind text replace and a
partial rename all fail their checks.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Choosing a local executor model, and tuning its knobs, needs measured
success rates across repeated runs, comparable with every model
measured before.
- Four canned milestones under nisse_dev/bench/tasks: write a function,
fix a bug a failing test exposes, thread an option through several
files, and find one failure in output far past max_output_chars. Each
is an approved plan over a seed project, judged by a hidden check the
model never sees; a reference solution proves each is solvable and
that its check tells the difference
- Runs use the agent's own client wiring, now shared as
make_llm_clients, with delegation and ask_expert off: an escalation is
a failure of the model under test
- Each run is stored as one JSON line in bench/results/, committed, with
the model's backing name and declared facts, a note on how it was
served, the task's content hash, the agent's commit and tuning, the
outcome, turns, misbehaviour counts, context trims, tokens, time and
LiteLLM's cost; a fallback answer can never count as a success
- The report rebuilds the comparison from every stored run, with Wilson
95% intervals, marking runs against older task versions
- scripts/benchmark.py runs and reports; scripts/evaluate_model.sh takes
a new model through the context probe, the capability matrix and the
benchmark in one command
- Clients keep LiteLLM's per-call cost, and BudgetedClient counts the
requests it had to trim
- The tuning guide gains "Benchmarking models"
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5