nisse/docs/Development-Plan.md

Nisse — Development Plan

Status: proposed for discussion. How to get from the code as it is to the full architecture in docs/Architecture.md, in what order, and how each step is accepted. The architecture says what and why; this document says how and when, and is revised as work lands.

It follows the format the architecture asks agents to use (D2): phases of milestones, each with a goal, scope and acceptance criteria, and each marked pre-approved or needs discussion.

---

1. Where we are

A survey of the code on main (2026-09-30) against each architecture section. Done means it exists and matches the architecture; partial means something exists but needs changing; none means not started.

Only nisse-dev has real code (about 10,000 lines in nisse-dev/src/nisse_dev/). nisse-core and nisse-ops are placeholder packages.

Section	Status	Notes
P Principles	—	Guidance; each milestone below applies them
L1 Work model	partial	One work item at a time with a minted ID; but the state store is a single row (agent_state, CHECK (id = 1)), not a work-items table with an active pointer. No duties, parking or switching (only nisse-ops needs duties)
L2 Agent loop	partial	control.py: a fixed state machine (arch → milestone gates → executing → PR open), with the no-stranding rule, stop, abandon, restart questions. To be replaced by the conversational loop
L3 Authority	partial	Revision binding and arrival stamping are done (gates.py, #74). Approvals are gates, not permissions; no pre-approved milestones, no trust dial
L4 Action classifier	none
L5 Conversation	partial	Matrix transport, mention handling, case-insensitive commands. Only the planner can ask (ask_human); no question handling, no explanations or progress prose, a misleading reply in IDLE
L6 Context and memory	partial	Context fitting is done (context.py). The transcript isn't scoped per work item and has no attribution or orchestrator facts (#78). No scope or agent memory
L7 Canonical log	partial	canonical.py: user, assistant, tool call/result, plan, gate, delegation, compaction events. Missing: work item and actor on every event, fact, classifier_verdict, knowledge_retrieved
L8 Durability and recovery	mostly done	WAL store, intents, boot reconciliation, adopting a published PR (#75), comment cursors and redelivery (#68, #76), Quint model (specs/). Needs moving onto the new loop and the work-items schema
L9 Models, roles, helpers	partial	LiteLLM client and catalog, context budgets, delegation with passthrough and caps, ask_expert, tool-choice handling, eval capture. Roles are executor/planner/delegate/consultant with a frontier planner; no driver, no capability profiles, no driver-chosen escalation
L10 Knowledge store	none
L11 Prompt injection	partial	Operator allowlists on every channel; no classifier, no structured intake beyond Gitea's JSON
L12 Secrets, identity, logging	partial	Structured state-change log (oplog.py); secrets from .env files; no Vaultwarden, no LLDAP identity
D2 Documents as workflow	none	Plans are posted to a Gitea issue; no project ARCHITECTURE.md or build plans in the repo
D3 Workspace	partial	Cloned once and reused as-is; no fetch, no fresh workspace, no preflight (#62, #27)
D4 Git and PRs	partial	Idempotent publishing (#75), committed work published (#63); git add -A sweeps in artifacts (#80); branches cut at publish from whatever HEAD is (#62)
D5 Review and merge	partial	Review loop on PR conversation comments; inline comments unseen (#69); watch stall (#70); operator merges; no trust dial (#65)
D7 Deployment	none	Bring-up runs on this box as root; no VM, VLAN or egress policy
O nisse-ops	none
X Deployment model	none

---

2. The environment today

Supporting services (X5) are installed and running: Matrix (Synapse), Gitea, LiteLLM, Vikunja, Outline, Vaultwarden, LLDAP with Authelia. Per-agent accounts and tokens are created as each agent needs them. So far nisse-dev has a Matrix test identity and room, a Gitea test account and sandbox repo, and dedicated LiteLLM keys.

Local inference: an RTX 4090 host, inference-4090.garrett-hall.com, running llama-swap (one model resident at a time), capped at 320 W. The executor benchmark (PR #55) chose qwen3.8-27b for nisse-dev's local work.

Models by role today (nisse-dev.example.yaml): executor qwen3.8-27b, planner and delegate claude-opus-5-5, consultant claude-haiku-4-5. Phase 2 moves to the architecture's roles (L9): driver local, helpers frontier.

Bring-up runs happen on this box, against test resources: the sandbox repo, the test Matrix room, a budget-capped LiteLLM key; configuration in ~/nisse-e2e/.

---

3. How we work

• One PR per milestone, usually. Every PR still starts with a short implementation plan per CLAUDE.md. For a pre-approved milestone that plan is a quick confirmation; a needs discussion milestone starts with a design discussion before any plan.
• Every change comes with tests, per CLAUDE.md, and runs through scripts/check.sh (lint, format, unit and integration tests).
• The Quint model moves with the loop. Any change to how the loop enters or leaves a waiting point updates specs/, and every counterexample is reproduced against the real code before it is fixed.
• A bring-up run on this box ends each phase where it can be run live. What it finds is filed as issues and fixed before the next phase starts, or explicitly deferred.
• Bring-up guards on this box (it isn't the sealed VM): the agent runs as an unprivileged user, touches only test resources, and keeps today's structural gates on in its bring-up configuration until the classifier and trust dial are proven (Phase 3).
• This plan is revised as we go: a milestone's scope may move once work shows its real shape, recorded here in the same PR.

---

4. Phases

Phase 0 — Housekeeping

M0.1 Retire the old spec. Pre-approved.

• Update every section reference in code, tests, specs/ and the CLAUDE.md and README.md files from the old spec's A–H to the new letters (table in §6).
• Delete docs/Architecture-Build-Spec.md (git keeps it); drop §6 from this plan.
• Acceptance: grep finds no reference to the old spec or its section numbers.

M0.2 A bring-up script, and an unprivileged agent user on this box. Pre-approved.

• One script: set aside the previous run's state, workspace and log; start the agent as an unprivileged user; collect logs and the transcript afterwards.
• Acceptance: a smoke run starts, answers status, and stops cleanly as that user.

Phase 1 — Foundations the new loop needs

These fix problems found in the live runs that survive the loop change. Issues that only exist because of control.py's state machine (#61, #79, #81) are folded into Phase 2's design instead of being fixed twice.

M1.1 Work items in the state store. Needs discussion (schema).

• A work-items table with an active pointer (L1); every canonical event carries its work item and its actor (L7). A migration for existing stores.
• Acceptance: two work items back to back keep separate state and events; a restart keeps both; migration tests.

M1.2 Transcript views. Needs discussion (rendering).

• Per-role rendering (L6): a role sees only its work item, attributed entries, and orchestrator fact events; never another role's raw turns as its own (#78).
• Acceptance: the second live run's confusion can't happen (a planning call after a milestone contains the milestone fact and PR, and no executor turns).

M1.3 A fresh workspace at use, and harness-owned branches. Pre-approved.

• Fetch; clean checkout of the latest base; set aside anything left over and report it (D3). Milestone branches cut by the harness from the task's workspace; "changes to publish" counted from the milestone's start (D4). Covers #62 and the clone-on-use half of #27.
• Acceptance: a leftover branch, uncommitted change and stale origin are each handled and reported; a second milestone's PR contains only its own commits.

M1.4 Publish only the work. Pre-approved.

• Standard excludes in the clone, and commit only what the work changed (D4, #80).
• Acceptance: a milestone that ran pytest publishes no .pyc; excluded files are reported.

M1.5 Review intake. Pre-approved.

• Inline review comments and review bodies (#69); no stall when a watch is replaced from its own callback (#70); replies in the thread where the comment was made (D5).
• Acceptance: tests for each; inline comments work in the phase's bring-up run.

Phase 1 acceptance: a bring-up run on the current loop with two milestones and a review comment, including inline ones.

Phase 2 — The conversational loop

Built alongside control.py, reusing the state store, canonical log, context fitting, publisher, pollers and recovery; nisse-dev switches over when the new loop passes its tests and a bring-up run, and control.py is retired.

M2.1 Loop design and its model. Needs discussion.

• A short design note (in the PR, then folded into the architecture where it settles something): the loop's turns, waiting points, pending questions, permissions it checks, and recovery. A new Quint model for it before code, with the no-stranding, approval-binding and at-least-once properties carried over.

M2.2 The loop core. Needs discussion.

• The driver-driven turn loop (L2): conversation, tool calls, pending questions, stop, abandon, intents and boot recovery on the work-items schema.
• Questions never change state (L5): the recognition rule is decided here (Q).
• Acceptance: the new Quint model's scenarios reproduced as tests; no-stranding under injected faults, as test_no_stranding.py does today.

M2.3 Roles and capability profiles. Pre-approved.

• Roles become driver, helper, expert, classifier (L9); capability profiles in configuration, filled from the benchmark; the driver's prompt encourages asking for help; observable escalation triggers; delegation and ask_expert wired to the new loop. Supersedes #46 (separate architect and planner roles).

M2.4 Conversation. Pre-approved (the behaviour is set by L5).

• Explanations with plans and revisions, finished-work summaries, progress in prose (#42), handling messages that can't be acted on yet, asking mid-work (#77).

M2.5 Documents as the workflow. Needs discussion.

• Project ARCHITECTURE.md and build plans in the repo, discussed and landed by PR; milestones marked pre-approved or needs discussion and whether they change code; permissions derived from them (L3, D2).
• Milestones and projects end properly: the plan declares its milestones; a no-change milestone that wasn't meant to change code is done; moving on checks the PR's state; finishing closes the issue (D4, D5). Supersedes #61, #79, #81.

M2.6 Switch over and retire control.py. Pre-approved, after acceptance.

• nisse-dev runs the new loop; control.py, its tests and the old Quint model are removed.

Phase 2 acceptance: a bring-up run: a new small project from conversation to an agreed ARCHITECTURE.md and build plan, two milestones (one pre-approved), a review comment answered, a question asked by the agent mid-milestone, and a crash mid-review.

Phase 3 — Authority

M3.1 Action classes and the fast path. Needs discussion.

• Every tool action classified by effect (P3); static fast-path rules per agent (D6); the scope each class-2 action is checked against.

M3.2 The action classifier. Needs discussion.

• L4, including the model choice (Q), fail-closed behaviour, logged verdicts, and operator overrides as an evaluation set.

M3.3 Permissions and the trust dial. Needs discussion.

• Approvals as scoped permissions, the operator-set trust dial, and agent merging behind branch protection the agent can't satisfy, verified by a test (L3, D4, D5, #65).

Phase 3 acceptance: a bring-up run with the classifier active and gates first on, then deliberately loosened in the bring-up configuration.

Phase 4 — The environment

M4.1 Toolchain preflight. Pre-approved. Detect, check, report before planning; toolchain facts in the transcript (D3).

M4.2 Providing toolchains. Needs discussion. Decide dev containers vs the VM image (Q), then build it.

M4.3 Environment repair. Pre-approved. The driver may clean caches and reinstall project dependencies within a task, and reports it (D3).

Phase 5 — Memory and knowledge

M5.1 The Outline client. Pre-approved. Per-agent Outline user and token, collections and documents by ID, revision reads, one writer per document (L10).

M5.2 Agent memory. Needs discussion. When notes are written and read, the index, verbatim corrections (L6).

M5.3 Scope memory for repositories. Pre-approved. Project documents read at work-item start and snapshotted; summaries at close (L6).

Phase 6 — nisse-dev in production

M6.1 The VM, VLAN and egress policy. Needs discussion. D7, X1, X2.

M6.2 Secrets and identity. Pre-approved. Vaultwarden machine accounts, LLDAP principal, secrets out of .env files (L12).

M6.3 Images and delivery. Pre-approved. Gitea Actions → OCI registry → Watchtower, restarts gated on an idle flag (X4).

M6.4 The browser tool. Pre-approved. Playwright on the internal test network only (D7).

Phase 7 — nisse-core and nisse-ops

M7.1 Extract nisse-core. Pre-approved. A package split within the monorepo: what both agents use moves into nisse-core.

M7.2 MCP servers. Needs discussion. Per (service, site, privilege) instances, tool profiles, configuration (X3, #37).

M7.3 Approved step sequences. Needs discussion. The ops plan format, matcher, policy file, expiry (O2).

M7.4 Tickets and duties. Needs discussion. Vikunja intake and approvals, scheduled checks and alert intake as duties (O5, #33).

M7.5 nisse-ops deployment. Needs discussion. O6.

Not yet scheduled

From the architecture's open questions (Q) and older issues, to be placed when their trigger arrives:

• more than one active work item per agent;
• vision for 3D design and video work;
• one local model for every agent, or agents taking turns on the inference host;
• several forges and projects (#26); a Matrix room per project (#28); creating a project from scratch and who owns it (#29); one agent instance per project (#30);
• infrastructure as code for agent VMs.

---

5. Open issues and where they land

All 19 open issues, as of 2026-09-30:

• 11 land in a milestone and stay open until it is done.
• 4 are superseded by the new loop's design. They only exist because of control.py's state machine, so fixing them there would be thrown away. They are closed, with a pointer to their milestone, when this plan is agreed.
• 4 are not yet scheduled and stay open until their trigger arrives.

Issue	Status	Lands in
#26 multiple forges	Not yet scheduled
#27 per-project state, clone on use	Milestone	M1.1 (state), M1.3 (clone)
#28 room per project	Not yet scheduled
#29 create a project from scratch	Not yet scheduled	Ownership decision first
#30 agent instance per project	Not yet scheduled
#33 Vikunja tickets	Milestone	M7.4
#37 MCP servers	Milestone	M7.2
#42 per-turn commentary	Milestone	M2.4
#46 architect and planner roles	Superseded	M2.3 (one driver, helpers)
#61 simpler milestone gating	Superseded	M2.5
#62 branch at execution start	Milestone	M1.3
#65 agent merges approved PRs	Milestone	M3.3
#69 inline review comments	Milestone	M1.5
#70 watch stall	Milestone	M1.5
#77 conversational agent	Milestone	M2.2 (questions), M2.4
#78 transcript scoping and attribution	Milestone	M1.1, M1.2
#79 ending projects and milestones	Superseded	M2.5
#80 build artifacts in PRs	Milestone	M1.4
#81 no-change milestones	Superseded	M2.5

---

6. Old section numbers → new (for M0.1, then removed)

Old (Architecture-Build-Spec.md)	New (Architecture.md)
0 Naming	Naming
0.1 What we're building, guiding principles	P1, P3–P8
0.2 Work model	L1
A1 Transport	L5
A2 State store, A3 Boot reconciliation	L8
A4 Control loop and gating	L2 (loop, stop, abandon), L3 (approvals)
A5 LLM access	L9
A6 Browser tool	D7, O4
A7 Secrets, A8 SSO identity, A9 Logging	L12
A10 Canonical transcript	L7 (schema), L6 (context)
A11 Roles, A12 Escalation, A13 Delegation, A14 ask_expert, A15 Local accommodations, A16 Eval capture	L9
A17 Knowledge store	L10 (store), L6 (memory)
A18 Prompt injection	L11
B1 Workflow	L2, D2
B2 Requirements	D2, D4, D5
B3 Deployment	D7
C1–C5 Sysadmin Agent	O1–O6 (C2 → O2, C3 → O4, C4 → O5, C5 → O6)
D Knowledge (Outline)	L10
E Supporting services	X5, and §2 here
F1–F4 Deployment model	X1–X4
G Build order	This plan
H Open decisions	Q