dongarandClaude Opus 5
cf85648719
- planner.py: LLMPlanningAgent offers exactly two tools, submit_plan and ask_human, so gating stays structural at the tool layer; no proceed tool exists. System prompt requires explicit, low-inference plans because a weaker model executes them (A13) - Model output is appended to the canonical log as it arrives, before being interpreted, so a crash mid-planning leaves a truthful transcript - A bad turn (prose instead of a tool call, malformed arguments, or a failed call) retries once, then raises PlanningError; the orchestrator gates to AWAIT_INPUT rather than inventing a plan - Orchestrator: appends every operator message, plan_submitted, and gate_opened to the transcript, so re-planning sees rejection feedback as conversation rather than out-of-band parameters; pins the A11 role mapping at task start - llm.py: non-JSON or non-object tool arguments now raise LLMError instead of escaping as JSONDecodeError — observed from llama3.2, which emits truncated argument strings - Live planning test is opt-in on NISSE_LIVE_PLANNER_MODEL: planning escalates unconditionally (A12) and the local model does not hold the tool-call contract, so it awaits a frontier route Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
nisse-dev
The Dev Agent: plans and implements software projects, produces Gitea PRs for human
review, and reacts to review comments and commits. A thin application over the
shared nisse-core library.
Part B of the specification at ../docs/Architecture-Build-Spec.md
covers this agent; Part A covers the library it sits on.