Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 e02bac110d Publish only the work: leave build artifacts out and report them (#80)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 56s
The clone gets the standard build artifacts in its own exclude file, so
they never show as changes, even to a model's `git add -A`. The
harness's commits leave the same patterns out even when the project
tracks them, as the sandbox's main did. What was left out is reported in
the publish note and the PR description. Found again in bring-up run 3
(sandbox PR #208).

Fixes #80.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:38:13 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 4f152af170 Flatten harness branch names so a model's branch can't block them
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 55s
Live run 3: the executor ran `git checkout -b <task id>` itself, and
publishing then failed, because git can't create '<task>/milestone-1'
while a branch named '<task>' exists. Milestone and delegation branches
are now '<task>-milestone-N' and 'delegation-milestone-N-F'. D4's
harness-owned branches (M2.1) remove the cause; this removes the
collision on the current loop.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:29:20 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 c931ac939b Let pushes go by an HTTPS token or an SSH deploy key
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 56s
The push credential is either a push-only account's token, handed to git
through a credential helper that names environment variables, never
values, or a deploy key in a short-lived ssh-agent. The remote URL
follows the credential. Configured as gitea.push_user and push_token, or
gitea.push_key.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 21:59:56 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 761ebdb857 Run every command on the build VM over SSH (M1.3)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 55s
execution.SSHHost.execute is now the only way the agent runs anything
(L13). Commands travel as a script on SSH's stdin, so the secrets handed
to a call are never on a command line, and every value handed out is
redacted from the output. Timeouts kill the remote process group, and
an unreachable host is reported as such, not as a failed command.

Workspace and GitRepo run on the build VM. The clone uses the
repository's SSH URL, so no credential is stored in it (#89); fetches
and pushes get the push key over stdin, in a short-lived ssh-agent,
and PRs are still opened from the agent's host with its API token.
The bench runs on the build host too.

Tests reach "the build VM" through a throwaway local sshd (nisse_dev
.testing); CI installs openssh-server. The live push test now pushes
with the sandbox's deploy key (NISSE_PUSH_KEY).

Fixes #89.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 21:39:46 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 8bd1ac0fa2 Adopt an already-published PR instead of publishing again
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Fixes counterexample 5 from specs/orchestrator.qnt. A crash after the
PR was opened but before PR_OPEN was recorded left the agent in
EXECUTING; the restart question's 'continue' and 'start' then published
again, Gitea refused a second PR, and there was no way back to PR_OPEN.
On the live run the executor model happened to notice the existing
work; recovery must not depend on that.

- Boot (A3 step 4): in EXECUTING, if Gitea shows the milestone's PR
  open, adopt it, watch it from the start, and resume in PR_OPEN with a
  notice. Gitea unreachable or the PR closed: the restart question, as
  before.
- MilestonePublisher.publish is idempotent: after pushing, an open PR
  for the branch is adopted (and so updated) rather than a second one
  opened. This also covers a PR opened whose response was lost.
- The model adopts too, gains the lost-response outcome, and now counts
  PRs opened per milestone (one_pr_per_milestone was a flag the fixed
  model could never set). A mutant without adoption fails the new
  scenario; the properties held over 200,000 traces each.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-09-29 19:58:19 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 f97e459bc7 Publish work the executor committed itself, and gate when there is none
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
On the first live run the executor committed its milestone itself, as
its plan asked. The publisher only published a commit it made, found a
clean tree, reported "no changes to publish", and left the agent in
EXECUTING, where every message is answered "busy".

- publish(): with nothing left to commit, publish anyway when the branch
  has commits origin/<base> lacks; report no changes only when it has
  none.
- push_followup(): same for review fixes, comparing HEAD with what the
  remote branch holds (ls-remote; pushes go by URL, so there is no
  tracking ref).
- Nothing to publish now gates to AWAIT_INPUT, and the reply returns to
  the still-approved milestone plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-09-29 16:17:41 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5 3117565928 Publish finished milestones as PRs (B2/A3) — step 6a, part 2
CI / checks (push) Successful in 41s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Completes the B1 loop past EXECUTING, and answers the question raised
reviewing #6: PR acceptance is a milestone's final gate, so there is
no separate FINISHED state — completion returns to milestone planning
or to IDLE.

- publish.py: MilestonePublisher commits the work on a task-namespaced
  branch, pushes, and opens a PR carrying the approved plan. Intent is
  recorded before the first externally visible act, so a crash
  anywhere in the sequence leaves a durable record and boot
  reconciliation asks Gitea whether the PR exists rather than opening
  a second one
- Nothing to commit is reported, not raised: the executor may
  legitimately conclude there was nothing to change
- control.py: PR_OPEN state with EXECUTING -> PR_OPEN and
  PR_OPEN -> {MILESTONE_PLANNING, IDLE}; operator commands
  'next milestone' and 'project complete'
- A configured publisher always contributes its own reconciler at
  boot, so an interrupted publish is settled against external truth
  without the caller having to remember to register it
- A publish failure gates to the operator rather than retrying into a
  possible duplicate

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-07 20:43:20 +00:00