Add the Anthropic passthrough renderer and client (A10/A13) — step 7a #20

Merged
dongar merged 1 commits from anthropic-renderer into main 2026-09-08 00:01:30 +00:00
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dongarandClaude Opus 5 f4a94281ef Add the Anthropic passthrough renderer and client (A10/A13) — 7a
CI / checks (push) Successful in 44s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 43s
The second renderer adapter, and the concrete case for A13's decision
to normalise in the renderer rather than on the wire. The two vendors
disagree structurally, not cosmetically: the system prompt is a
top-level field rather than a message, a tool call is a tool_use
content block rather than an array, a tool result is a block inside a
user message rather than a "tool" role, and tool schemas use
input_schema rather than parameters. A middlebox flattening those
would be lossy exactly where a long-running delegation lives.

- render_anthropic.py builds vendor-native /v1/messages bodies from
  the canonical log, coalescing adjacent same-role blocks so a
  tool_result lands directly after its tool_use
- Tool manifests are declared once in OpenAI shape and converted per
  vendor, so adding a tool does not mean editing two places
- AnthropicPassthroughClient implements the same LLMClient protocol,
  so callers pick a route rather than a different kind of client, and
  maps provider tool ids to canonical ones at the boundary
- Dangling tool calls get a placeholder result here too; this API
  rejects them more strictly than the OpenAI shape
- Vendor-opaque reasoning blocks are dropped for now with the reason
  recorded: A10 wants them stored and never replayed across sessions,
  and the canonical schema has no event for that yet

Live tests prove the body is accepted as sent, that a tool_result
turn round-trips, and — as A5 asks — that prompt cache accounting
survives the passthrough rather than being flattened by the proxy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-07 23:13:22 +00:00