Enforce the tool-call contract, asking servers only where it works #45

Merged
dongar merged 1 commits from enforce-tool-calls into main 2026-09-25 00:05:47 +00:00
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 b934c46714 Enforce the tool-call contract, asking servers only where it works
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 56s
The executor ended a milestone on any reply without a tool call, and
nothing held a model to the offered tools. Measured on the 4070:
tool_choice "required" is enforced by vLLM (local-fast) and Anthropic,
but qwen3-14b (local-coder) under it cannot stop and writes until the
output ceiling, a known model bug. So enforcement is asked for per
model, and the loop holds the contract itself everywhere.

- The catalog reads supports_tool_choice from LiteLLM's model_info;
  BudgetedClient sends tool_choice only to models declared true, as
  "required" on the normalized route and {"type": "any"} on the
  Anthropic passthrough, and only when tools are offered
- The executor gains an explicit finish tool, the only way to end a
  milestone. Finishing with nothing changed is refused once; a prose
  reply gets one nudge, then escalates; a call to a tool not offered
  counts toward failure_limit, like a failed command; calls after
  finish are recorded as not run
- Clients record the model that actually answered. ModelFacts.answered
  recognises a proxy fallback, which once credited Claude's answers to
  a local model that could not call tools at all
- The context probe reports a fallback instead of trusting it; rerun,
  both local models now refuse over-long prompts, as they should
- The capability matrix checks every answer came from the model asked,
  that models call only offered tools, and that a declared
  supports_tool_choice is true
- Spec A15 and the tuning guide say how enforcement is requested,
  declared and backed up

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 22:54:49 +00:00