dongarandClaude Opus 5.5
e5450e3e77
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
A restart in AWAIT_INPUT replaced the saved pending item with a generic "continue or re-plan?" whose answer nothing handled: the reply cleared it and left the agent in AWAIT_INPUT with nothing to resume, where 'use' was refused too. The first live run hit this after a planning failure and could not be moved by any message. - Waiting on the operator is a committed state (A3 step 8): on boot, ask the saved question again instead of replacing it. _await_input keeps the prompt with the pending item for this. - The restart question (A3 step 7) records the state it interrupted, and 'continue' / 're-plan' now do what they offer: re-run the interrupted planning turn, or return an interrupted milestone to its approved plan. Any other reply asks again rather than being swallowed. - With nothing pending, 'use <project>' starts over, as the reply already advised. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nisse
Two self-hosted AI agents sharing a common library, named for the Nordic farm spirit that keeps the place running overnight and expects to be treated well in return.
| Package | Role |
|---|---|
nisse-core/ |
Shared library both agents sit on (Part A) |
nisse-dev/ |
Dev Agent — plans and implements software projects (Part B) |
nisse-ops/ |
Sysadmin Agent — operates infrastructure (Part C) |
One repository, three packages. The library does not exist as code yet: it is
extracted from nisse-dev once that agent works (build-order step 10), as a
package split within this tree.
Architecture
The system-level specification lives at
docs/Architecture-Build-Spec.md. It covers the
shared library, both agents, the supporting services, the build order, and the
remaining open decisions.