Commit Graph
334 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dev-agent 2d6aa98f87 Merge pull request 'Conversation on the new loop (M2.7)' (#114) from conversation into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 7m0s
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
2026-10-07 19:20:35 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 8994b3fb4b Conversation on the new loop (M2.7)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 13m26s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 38m44s
- Questions never change state (L5, #77): a message ending in "?" to a
  waiting project item starts a question run (reply and look-only tools,
  an instruction to change nothing), and the item goes back to the very
  wait it was in: a restatement up stays up and a go binds to it; the
  agent's own question stays open.
- Explanations: a restatement gives its reasons and the main alternative;
  a revision says what changed (restate(changed), sent back without it);
  a milestone's summary says what was done, verified and left open.
- Progress in prose (#42): the driver's and a helper's own words for a
  turn are posted, trimmed, at most once a minute per item; `details`
  shows the last tool calls; a message arriving mid-run is acknowledged at
  once ("Noted; ...").
- CI: the e2e job's comments and the plan no longer claim a newer push
  cancels the run it supersedes (Gitea here doesn't); the concurrency
  block goes.

Tests: conversation unit tests (questions in a go-ahead and an answer wait,
an unanswerable question, revisions, progress rate and trimming, details,
mid-run notes), the helper's progress, the walk asking questions in every
state with a questions_change_nothing property (routing questions the old
way fails 32 of 48 seeds), and an e2e question while a restatement is up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 18:01:51 +00:00
dev-agent 5967d022b6 Merge pull request 'Roles, capability profiles and help on the new loop (M2.6)' (#113) from roles into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 6m6s
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
2026-10-07 17:40:45 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 ba001a9cec CI: run the e2e job only after the checks pass
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m48s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 21m52s
A PR that's already red doesn't spend ~25 minutes of the RTX 4090.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 16:40:49 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 59fd00ce8c Roles, capability profiles and help on the new loop (M2.6)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 5m23s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Canceled after 21m42s
- roles.driver (unset: the planner's model) and roles.classifier (unset:
  the expert's); the mapping is pinned when an item opens, and the driver
  and the go-ahead reader run on the item's own (L9).
- profiles: in configuration (tools, strengths, weaknesses), used in
  briefings: the driver's instructions say what its helper and expert are
  good at, the helper's brief who reads its handback; never a model name.
- delegate(task) and ask_expert(question) for the driver. A helper works
  on a branch off the milestone's; on a handback its work comes back as
  uncommitted changes, otherwise it is discarded, so harness branches
  never hold commits only the clone has. ask_expert keeps its budget.
- Triggers: failure_limit failed commands in a row (Driver's new "stuck"
  outcome) or the turn cap, mid-milestone, call a helper in once per
  milestone; if it fails too, the item waits on the operator. A
  delegation cut off by a crash is discarded at boot.
- Evaluation capture: delegations and ask_expert as before, and the
  reader's verdicts as classifier pairs.

Tests: help tests (merge-back, discard, needs a milestone, the stuck
trigger and its once-per-milestone limit, the expert and its budget,
pinning, briefings by profile, boot discarding a cut-off delegation),
config tests for roles and profiles, and the walk delegating with a
scripted helper that sometimes fails, with a delegations_settle property.
The walk found helper commits stranded on a merged PR's branch, fixed by
returning a helper's work uncommitted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 16:33:26 +00:00
dev-agent 04c352b30c Merge pull request 'New projects from conversation (M2.5, PR B)' (#108) from new-projects into main
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / checks (push) Successful in 5m6s
2026-10-07 16:25:41 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 88c7d2e8c9 A design milestone holds documents only, enforced
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m4s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 24m22s
Found by the first local e2e run: qwen3.8-27b put a new project's code in
the same PR as its ARCHITECTURE.md, with no build plan. D1 says a `design`
item agrees its design before any code, and that rested on wording only.

- Until a PR of a `design` item has merged, finish_milestone is sent back
  if the milestone changes anything but ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/, naming
  the paths to take out. The merge is recorded (design_merged) and code
  may follow.
- The label's instruction and the new project's brief say so plainly:
  documents first, in a PR of their own; code after it has merged.

Tests: a design milestone with code is sent back and only the documents
are published, then code after the merge; the walk's model follows the
rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 15:39:00 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 ad2d090143 New projects from conversation (M2.5, PR B)
- propose_project(name, purpose, decisions) in a conversation goes up for
  a go-ahead (checked: a slug, not an existing project, no trailing
  question).
- On go, the provisioning checklist (D1): a repository with a README,
  protection on its default branch, the agent as a collaborator, a build
  VM, a deploy key, and the project entry as YAML with <...> to fill in.
- On "done", the agent reads its configuration again and adds the new
  project live (build_loop_agent(load=...); only additions), then checks
  what was provided (D4, verified, not assumed): permissions and
  protection as it sees them, then on a throwaway branch with an empty
  commit, a branch push must succeed and a push to the default branch and
  merging its own PR must be refused. The check's PR is closed and its
  branch deleted. Failures are said per item; nothing starts.
- Checked: the tracking issue (the distilled decisions, carrying the new
  item's ID), and the project's item, agreed and labelled `design`, whose
  first milestone is ARCHITECTURE.md and the build plan. A conversation
  waiting on provisioning doesn't close as idle.
- The walk replays exactly from its seed (item IDs too), and event IDs
  stay unique across simulated restarts, as a server's are.
- The test config holds output to 8192 tokens, under the test key's
  per-request cost cap.

Tests: new-project unit tests (checklist and its YAML parse as config, done
before the entry, what isn't set up, a checked project's record and first
PR, an existing name), protection enforced by a hook on the fake forge,
the walk proposing projects and saying done, and an e2e new project in a
repository the test operator provisions from the agent's checklist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 15:39:00 +00:00
dongar 9a86ccb2a4 Merge pull request 'End-to-end tests on a local model, and in CI on every PR' (#110) from e2e-local-model into main
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / checks (push) Successful in 5m26s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#110
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-07 15:38:45 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 6db80dfb4b End-to-end tests on a local model, and in CI on every PR
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m26s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 17m27s
- Every e2e role runs on qwen3.8-27b on the RTX 4090 (e2e_roles();
  NISSE_E2E_MODEL overrides, e.g. claude-haiku-4-5). The first full run
  passed 7 of 8 in 26 minutes for $0.0000; the eighth was a real finding,
  fixed with the new-project PR.
- scripts/e2e.sh reports a run's spend on the test key and the day's total
  against its budget: above $0 on the local model means a paid fallback.
- CI runs the suite as its own job on pull requests (not pushes to main),
  on a throwaway sshd (--local), cancelling a run a newer push supersedes,
  so the checks job still reports in minutes.
- The plan says so: e2e on every PR; locally only -k / --lf.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-07 15:14:43 +00:00
dev-agent b3bf6d5a6e Merge pull request 'A repository per test run instead of the shared sandbox' (#107) from fresh-test-repos into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 5m30s
2026-10-06 05:26:00 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 679ace1fd8 A repository per test run instead of the shared sandbox
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m17s
Every live test that touches a repository gets one of its own from
e2e_support.fresh_repo, made by the test operator as an operator makes a
project's (D4, D8): seeded from tests/integration/seed/ (the sandbox's
package, without past runs' leftovers), the agent's account a collaborator
with write access, main protected (pushes only by the owner, an approval to
merge), and a deploy key generated for the run. It is deleted afterwards
(NISSE_E2E_KEEP_REPOS keeps it); scripts/e2e-cleanup.sh deletes leftovers.

- Both e2e fixtures use it; per-run base branches are gone. The merge
  helper approves first, as the protection now requires.
- test_gitea_live uses it, so CI needs NISSE_OPERATOR_TOKEN and no longer
  writes the sandbox deploy key (NISSE_PUSH_KEY).
- A live test of the helper: seeded, shared with the agent, protected
  against it, deleted.
- nisse-test.yaml's project entry is a placeholder; pytest and ruff skip
  the seed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 05:10:27 +00:00
dev-agent 6c962e1ed9 Merge pull request 'Conversations on the new loop (M2.5, PR A)' (#106) from loop-conversations into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 5m5s
2026-10-06 04:33:05 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 3f54896f65 Conversations on the new loop (M2.5, PR A)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m14s
- A top-level message that isn't a command is a conversation: an item in
  the `general` scope (L1), threaded under the operator's message, with
  `reply`, `ask_human` and `propose_work` and no workspace or execution.
  `general` is reserved as a project name.
- propose_work(project, title, summary) goes up as a revision for a
  go-ahead (or a plain yes). On go, under a file_issue intent (L8), the
  record issue is opened in that project, assigned to the agent and
  carrying the new item's ID; its item starts agreed, with the summary as
  its brief. Intake skips any issue carrying an ID (D1); boot adopts a
  filed issue or puts the proposal up again.
- A conversation closes after tuning.loop.general_idle_s (default a day);
  a reply in its thread then starts a new conversation that continues it.

Tests: conversation unit tests (threading, filing, the marker, an unknown
project, changes, idle close and continuation, a plain yes, both crash
cases, commands at top level); the walk with conversations, proposals and
idle time, and records_have_one_item / conversations_do_no_work; an e2e
conversation that becomes filed work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 04:26:40 +00:00
dev-agent d70d43a8cc Merge pull request 'Projects as configuration entries (M1.4)' (#105) from projects into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 5m14s
2026-10-06 03:42:06 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 6aa1439a7f Entry-point test: a config with no projects is named in the startup errors
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 5m28s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 02:36:06 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 064d9bf554 Projects as configuration entries (M1.4, D8)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 5m7s
- Config: `projects: {name: entry}` with repo, base_branch, workspace,
  build_host, push credential, labels (defaults added to every issue),
  secrets by ${VAR} reference with visibility (commands | harness), and
  egress (recorded, not enforced). Every problem in every entry is
  reported at once; an inline secret, a bad visibility, a repeated repo or
  a non-slug name is an error.
- The old loop runs exactly one project (only_project) and refuses more.
- The new loop is per project: each its own clone, workspace (with its
  commands-visible secrets, redacted on return), push credential and
  milestones; intake polls every project's repository; items are scoped
  to their project for every run, publish and PR watch. Issues are named
  project#14 when there is more than one project, and a bare #14 that
  matches two is asked about. Switching projects parks the one worked on
  last (all others after a boot).
- A restatement that ends in a question is sent back to the driver, not
  posted: the e2e driver kept asking "Is this the right interpretation?",
  which a plain yes can't answer.

Tests: config entries and errors, two-project assembly, two-project loop
tests (intake, own workspaces and repos, #14 in both, do-next, label
defaults, parking across projects), the property walk over two projects
with a new own_repository_only property (an item using the first
project's repo fails 15 of 16 seeds), and the restatement check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 01:12:57 +00:00
dongar 4ecff19933 Merge pull request 'Architecture: the general scope and the new-project sequence (for M2.5)' (#104) from arch-general into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 3m41s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#104
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-06 00:29:48 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 b78fd58c85 general never gets a build VM: an experiment means starting the project
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 3m44s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 00:22:02 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 d301cba362 Architecture: the general scope and the new-project sequence (for M2.5)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
- L1: `general`, the scope of conversation not (yet) about a project: an
  item per thread, no repository, build VM or execution; closes after a day
  idle, a later reply starting a linked item.
- L5: every conversation is an item from its first message; chit-chat is
  answered, only work gets a Gitea issue.
- D1: a conversation's record issue is opened once it's work on a project.
  The new-project sequence: proposal, a provisioning checklist in Matrix,
  verified when the operator says done, a tracking issue carrying the
  distilled decisions (not the raw chat), then the architecture PRs.
- Q: a scratch build VM for general replaces the answered question about
  records for pure conversations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-06 00:21:34 +00:00
dev-agent 3adbcce2a6 Merge pull request 'Multi-milestone work and documents on the new loop (M2.4)' (#103) from loop-milestones into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 3m44s
2026-10-05 23:56:30 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 cd9ab2559e Multi-milestone work and documents on the new loop (M2.4)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 3m45s
- Every milestone branch is cut from the latest default branch: the next
  milestone builds on the merged previous one, and a redo after a closed PR
  drops the rejected work. Uncommitted work comes along.
- While the item's PR is open, start_milestone is refused, with the PR's
  state read from Gitea at that moment, not the last watch round.
- finish_milestone(final): earlier PRs say "Part of #N", the last "Closes
  #N"; unsaid, it's final, as before.
- close_item with the item's PR still open waits for the merge (L2: a
  closed item leaves nothing open).
- The driver's instructions cover ARCHITECTURE.md and build plans under
  docs/plans/ (D2); the harness never parses a plan.
- Parking stashes uncommitted work and pushes it to <item>-parked, put back
  on resume, instead of committing it onto the item's branch. The walk
  found a half-done review fix parked onto a PR that had merged meanwhile,
  where it was lost. Architecture D4's parking line says so.

Tests: unit tests for fresh milestone branches, the merge wait (including
a merge not yet watched), redo after a closed PR, Part of/Closes, close
waiting on an open PR, and the parked-fix regression; the walk's new
milestones_start_fresh property (fork-from-current fails 9 seeds); an e2e
two-milestone feature.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-05 20:57:37 +00:00
dongar da32cac5cf Merge pull request 'Threads, commands and labels on the new loop (M2.3)' (#102) from loop-labels into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 3m42s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#102
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-04 20:15:08 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 4d9c1d7529 Threads, commands and labels on the new loop (M2.3)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 3m45s
- Commands that name their item ("go #14", "abandon #14", "stop #14")
  apply to it wherever they're said; go, approve and abandon alone at top
  level are asked about (L5). stop is never taken as an answer.
- A plain-language reply to a restatement is read by GoAheadReader, one
  model call that agrees only on a clear yes; questions never reach it. The
  agent says "taking that as a go-ahead on rev-N" first, bound to the
  revision on screen at arrival (L3, L5, D1).
- Labels steer (D1): `bug` goes ahead after tuning.loop.bug_grace_s
  (default 600 s) unless the operator replies; `discuss` isn't offered
  restate until the operator has spoken; `bug`, `discuss` and `design` add
  to the driver's instructions. A restatement asks no questions.

Tests: label and command unit tests, the property walk with labelled
issues, plain yeses, named gos and time passing (grace_only_unanswered,
discuss_talks_first), and e2e tests for a bug proceeding after its grace
period and a plain-language go-ahead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-04 16:13:22 +00:00
dongar a504526da2 Merge pull request 'The queue: parking, the operator's order, blocked items (M2.2)' (#101) from loop-queue into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 3m30s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#101
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-04 15:21:46 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 cceb30c729 The queue: parking, the operator's order, blocked items (M2.2)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 3m26s
Several work items on the new loop (L1, D4):
- Switching parks the item on the workspace: its work is committed and its
  branch pushed; resuming checks the item's branch back out. Branches of
  open items are never set aside by a fresh workspace.
- Next item: the operator's "do #N next" first, otherwise the oldest.
- Issues with open Gitea dependencies are blocked until they close, checked
  at intake and on every round; status shows blocked items and the line.

Tests: queue unit tests, the property walk over several issues with
dependencies and a new parked_work_safe property (it catches parking
disabled), and an end-to-end test with two issues where B depends on A.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-04 13:34:09 +00:00
dongar d504588a57 Merge pull request 'Answer where asked, wait on a merge, and let the driver title PRs' (#100) from loop-review-replies into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 2m50s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#100
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-03 18:00:01 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 f0fdd75626 Mark M2.1 done in the Development Plan
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 2m22s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 17:29:36 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 651551aab4 Answer where asked, wait on a merge, and let the driver title PRs
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 2m17s
From the new loop's first live run (sandbox #255, PR #256):
- A question asked on the PR is answered on the PR (an inline one quoted
  with its file and line, since the API can't reply in its thread), with
  a pointer in the item's Matrix thread; one asked in Matrix stays there.
- wait_for_review: when a review needs no change, or only the operator's
  merge is left, the item waits on the merge instead of on an answer.
- finish_milestone takes the PR's title from the driver.
The e2e test's merge waits out Gitea's brief 'try again later' after a
push.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 17:29:28 +00:00
dongar bf416cad09 Merge pull request 'Properties against the real loop, and the slice end to end (M2.1, PR D)' (#99) from loop-properties into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 2m20s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#99
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-03 16:43:09 +00:00
dongar d05d000dd5 Merge pull request 'The new loop's core: intake, restatement, go-ahead, threads (M2.1, PR B)' (#97) from loop-core into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m56s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#97
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-03 16:42:57 +00:00
dongar 64273557d3 Merge pull request 'Matrix threads in the transport (M2.1, PR A)' (#96) from matrix-threads into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m41s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#96
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-03 16:42:40 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 37965aefca Fix the run-breaking tool-result order; e2e test runs the slice (M2.1, PR D)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 2m17s
The first live run of the new loop's e2e test found that a fact recorded
while start_milestone was in flight landed between the tool call and its
result; both API formats reject that, so every later request in the run
failed. Views now keep each result right after its call. Scripted test
models check the APIs' ordering rules, so this can't pass unit tests
again.

The e2e tests no longer depend on the sandbox's history: each run asks for
a uniquely named function and works against a base branch of its own,
deleted afterwards. The review step asks for a change that can't already
be there. The scripted operator gives up after five fruitless answers, and
each run keeps its state store for inspection. The driver's prompt says
review fixes stay in the current milestone.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 15:11:06 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 30ab5c9b9c Make nisse-testing-operator a Gitea operator in the test config only
CI / checks (push) Skipped
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 14:39:35 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 897181b0f4 Add the end-to-end test of the new loop's slice (M2.1, PR D part 2)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
From an issue the scripted operator files and assigns in Gitea, through
the restatement, go-ahead, milestone and PR, a review comment answered
with a pushed fix, to an approved and merged PR and a closed item and
issue. The operator acts in Gitea through its own test account
(NISSE_OPERATOR_TOKEN) and in the item's thread through the in-memory
transport. Runs from scripts/e2e.sh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 14:20:07 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 266b5dbbd7 Check loop.qnt's properties against the real loop (M2.1, PR D part 1)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
test_loop_properties.py walks the new loop with a seeded mix of operator
and Gitea actions (go-aheads, stale go-aheads, answers, comments, merges,
the comment-then-merge race, closes, abandon, a crash and restart) and an
adaptive scripted model, checking every loop.qnt property after every
step. It found two bugs, both fixed with regression tests: abandoning an
item left its open PR open (the model's fix 1, now in code), and after a
review fix became a follow-up PR, the next fix went to the merged branch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-03 14:19:19 +00:00
dongar 510d395ead Merge pull request 'Milestones and review in the new loop (M2.1, PR C)' (#98) from loop-milestones into loop-core
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m51s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#98
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-03 14:09:17 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 21744efac1 Milestones and review in the new loop (M2.1, PR C)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
A work item starts from a fresh workspace: fetch, set aside (never
discard) leftover changes, branches and unpushed commits, a clean default
branch, and a branch of its own (D3, #62). start_milestone cuts the
milestone's branch; finish_milestone commits only the work, pushes and
opens a PR that closes the issue, under an intent, adopting an open PR and
treating a closed one as the operator's answer (D4). Between runs the
loop watches each item's PR: operator comments and inline review notes
(#69) reach the item, a merge or close hands back to the driver. A review
fix is checked after it's pushed and goes out as a new PR if the PR merged
first (D5). At boot an interrupted publish is settled against Gitea (L8).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 23:53:02 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 f84bb70839 The new loop's core: intake, restatement, go-ahead, threads (M2.1, PR B)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
nisse_dev.loop runs alongside control.py, chosen with `loop: new`.
Issues assigned to the agent (by an operator, or filed by one) become work
items, each with a Matrix thread. A driver run is one model with tools
until it calls a waiting tool: restate puts rev-N up for a go-ahead, bound
to the revision on screen when the reply arrived; ask_human waits for an
answer; close_item closes the item and its issue. Before the go-ahead the
driver can look but not change or close anything. One item is active at a
time; replies in an item's thread go to it. On boot, an item cut off
mid-run waits on the operator, and waiting points are put up again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 23:46:42 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 6dff36f458 Matrix threads in the transport (M2.1, PR A)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
Transport.post(text, thread=...) returns the event ID, which can root a
thread; a threaded post carries m.thread with the reply fallback for
clients without threads. Inbound messages carry their event ID and thread
root: a message in a thread gives its root, a plain reply joins the
thread of the message it replies to when known, and the quoted lines of a
rich reply are no longer part of the text. The in-memory transport plays
threads for tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 23:40:24 +00:00
dev-agent 5077ed0067 Merge pull request 'Mark M1.3 done in the Development Plan' (#94) from plan-m13-done into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m39s
2026-10-02 23:31:41 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 a0e30f73a9 Mark M1.6 and Phase 1 done
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 23:21:15 +00:00
dongar 202a0ca117 Merge pull request 'Add the end-to-end test, run after each milestone (M1.6)' (#95) from e2e-test into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m40s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#95
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-02 23:19:03 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 b9f52be42c Add the end-to-end test, run after each milestone (M1.6)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
tests/integration/test_end_to_end.py drives the whole assembled agent
(real models, the Gitea sandbox, a real build host) through a milestone
with a scripted operator, and checks what bring-up run 3 checked by hand:
a PR holding only the work, pushed with the push credential; no
credential in the clone; the planner's view carrying facts, not the
executor's turns. It cleans up after itself on the sandbox and the build
host.

scripts/e2e.sh runs it on the bring-up build VM (or --local). It has its
own marker, e2e, kept out of check.sh and CI since it spends tokens.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:59:13 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 577a08bf95 Reorder the plan for a minimal live loop, checked by an end-to-end test
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m46s
The priority is the smallest new loop running live, so M1.4 and M1.5 move
after M2.1. Each milestone is now checked by an automated end-to-end test
(new M1.6) against real resources, not a manual live run; manual runs are
for the new loop's first runs and phase ends.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:51:26 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 92e67b8bd9 Mark M1.3 done in the Development Plan
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
#93 merged; #80 landed early with it, so M2.1 no longer carries it. #78,
#80 and #89 are closed and leave the issue map.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:44:59 +00:00
dongar 3cc3eed8f3 Merge pull request 'Run every command on the build VM over SSH (M1.3)' (#93) from ssh-execution into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m49s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#93
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-02 22:44:21 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 d5cef02e89 Keep credentials out of reprs; count only live ssh-agents in tests
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m43s
A failing CI test printed a test key through SSHKey's default repr. Push
credentials, AgentConfig's tokens and MatrixConfig's token are now
excluded from their reprs, so no failure or log line can print them. In
CI's container killed ssh-agents linger as zombies, so the tests count
only live ones.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:41:01 +00:00
dongarandClaude Opus 5.5 e02bac110d Publish only the work: leave build artifacts out and report them (#80)
CI / checks (push) Skipped
CI / checks (pull_request) Failing after 56s
The clone gets the standard build artifacts in its own exclude file, so
they never show as changes, even to a model's `git add -A`. The
harness's commits leave the same patterns out even when the project
tracks them, as the sandbox's main did. What was left out is reported in
the publish note and the PR description. Found again in bring-up run 3
(sandbox PR #208).

Fixes #80.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPQ14L3LikyefCMFBqEbKE
2026-10-02 22:38:13 +00:00
dongar f8a7963484 Merge pull request 'Rework the Development Plan around live testing' (#92) from plan-rework into main
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m19s
Reviewed-on: dongar/nisse#92
Reviewed-by: Don Garrett <dgarrett@acm.org>
2026-10-02 22:32:17 +00:00